Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0990

reference
787-tree-1
name
0990
tree-preservation-order

undefined

787-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.044492 50.866139)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.044435 50.866133,-1.044438 50.866144,-1.044446 50.866154,-1.044458 50.866162,-1.044474 50.866168,-1.044492 50.866170,-1.044509 50.866168,-1.044525 50.866163,-1.044538 50.866155,-1.044546 50.866145,-1.044549 50.866134,-1.044547 50.866123,-1.044539 50.866113,-1.044526 50.866105,-1.044511 50.866100,-1.044493 50.866098,-1.044475 50.866099,-1.044459 50.866104,-1.044447 50.866112,-1.044438 50.866122,-1.044435 50.866133)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL